www.euroncap.comFrontal Impact takes place at 64 Km/h, 40% of the width of the car striking a deformable barrier. In the side impact, a mobile deformable barrier impacts the driver's door at 50 km/h. In the pole test, the car tested is propelled sideways at 29km/h into a rigid pole. Euro NCAP | Jeep...
Read More: carscoop.blogspot.com Euro NCAP 2012...
Read More: carscoop.blogspot.com Euro NCAP 2012...
Fiat Group Automobiles' attempts to push Jeep's Compass SUV on European markets has received a significant blow with the news that crash testing body EuroNCAP has awarded the recently facelifted 'soft-roader' just 2 stars. In total the Compass scored 61 percent for Adult Occupancy, 76 percent for Child Occupancy, 23 percent for Pedestrian Safety and 43 percent for Safety Assist. EuroNCAP has rejigged its safety rating tests for 2012 and the Compass is one of just two cars tested so far to this new criteria (the other, Honda's new Civic, gained the maximum 5 star rating). EuroNCAP has however also confirmed that five cars tested last year also meet the 2012 criteria: the BMW 1 Series, BMW X1, Ford Focus, Ford Ranger, Mercedes M-class, Nissan LEAF, Subaru XV and Volvo V60. In a scathing report, EuroNCAP states that the Compass fell short of its metrics in almost every area. ..." onmouseout="mouseOutImage(this, '4', 'FFFFFF')" onmouseover="mousOverImage(this,'6rwNganapbI',1, '4','FFCC00')" /> ItaliaspeedTV -...
euroncap.comEuro NCAP carried out sine-with-dwell tests according to the ESC GTR global technical regulation, which is based on the US regulation FMVSS126. The testwere completed on all cars whose results were released in 2009. For cars that allowed the ESC system to be switched off, tests were carried out with ESC ON and OFF. Cars were tested by undergoing multiple runs, sometimes as much as 60 per car, each time increasing the steering angle and input. The clip shows the first ESC off test where the car span out. The ESC on test is the one with the same steering input. Euro NCAP | Jeep...
Two Stars Adult occupant The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Structures in the dashboard presented a risk of injury to the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies and the car was penalised. The Compass was tested with an optional side thorax airbag. In the side pole impact, dummy readings of rib deflections indicated a high risk of serious chest injury, even with the airbag fitted, and the car scored no points in that test. In the side barrier test, the car scored maximum points. Euro NCAP has reviewed data supplied by Jeep and concludes that scoring in the side barrier test is not significantly affected by the airbag. The Compass is equipped with an active head restraint. This senses when the car has been struck and deploys the restraint to reduce the distance between the head and the restraint. However, Jeep did not provide evidence to demonstrate that the system operates robustly over a range of speeds and impact severities specified by Euro NCAP, so the system was tested 'passively', without deployment. Test results indicated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in a rear impact. Child occupant Forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive in the frontal impact. In the side impact, both the 3 year and the 18 month dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the risk of contact with parts of the car's interior <b>...</b> 2012 Jeep Compass...
Fiat Group Automobiles' attempts to push Jeep's Compass SUV on European markets has received a significant blow with the news that crash testing body EuroNCAP has awarded the recently facelifted 'soft-roader' just 2 stars. In total the Compass scored 61 percent for Adult Occupancy, 76 percent for Child Occupancy, 23 percent for Pedestrian Safety and 43 percent for Safety Assist. EuroNCAP has rejigged its safety rating tests for 2012 and the Compass is one of just two cars tested so far to this new criteria (the other, Honda's new Civic, gained the maximum 5 star rating). EuroNCAP has however also confirmed that five cars tested last year also meet the 2012 criteria: the BMW 1 Series, BMW X1, Ford Focus, Ford Ranger, Mercedes M-class, Nissan LEAF, Subaru XV and Volvo V60. In a scathing report, EuroNCAP states that the Compass fell short of its metrics in almost every area. ..." onmouseout="mouseOutImage(this, '4', 'FFFFFF')" onmouseover="mousOverImage(this,'M4aJ2dBe4nQ',1, '4','FFCC00')" /> ItaliaspeedTV -...
www.youcar.tv Adult occupant The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Structures in the dashboard presented a risk of injury to the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies and the car was penalised. The Compass was tested with an optional side thorax airbag. In the side pole impact, dummy readings of rib deflections indicated a high risk of serious chest injury, even with the airbag fitted, and the car scored no points in that test. In the side barrier test, the car scored maximum points. Euro NCAP has reviewed data supplied by Jeep and concludes that scoring in the side barrier test is not significantly affected by the airbag. The Compass is equipped with an active head restraint. This senses when the car has been struck and deploys the restraint to reduce the distance between the head and the restraint. However, Jeep did not provide evidence to demonstrate that the system operates robustly over a range of speeds and impact severities specified by Euro NCAP, so the system was tested 'passively', without deployment. Test results indicated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in a rear impact. Child occupant Forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive in the frontal impact. In the side impact, both the 3 year and the 18 month dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the risk of contact with parts of the car's <b>...</b> 2012 Jeep Compass...
The recently refreshed Jeep Compass achieved only two stars against the 2012 criteria, underachieving in most areas of Euro NCAP's assessment. The compact SUV was tested with an optional side thorax airbag but its test results showed a poor protection levels, particularly in the side pole test. In pedestrian protection, the Compass scored a disappointing 23 percent. Compact SUVs are the most popular sport-utility segment in Europe, but the 2011 Jeep Compass did not demonstrate itself as strong contender on safety in comparison to other tested competitors in the same category. Crash Test - Jeep...
Jeep Compass Euro NCAP çarpışma testi Jeep Compass Euro...
El test Euro NCAP del Jeep Compass 2012 destaca por sus negativos resultados. El Compass ha obtenidos unas calificaciones muy pobres en cuanto a niveles de protección, especialmente en el caso de impacto lateral. Unas notas que también afectan a la protección de los peatones (23%). Más vídeos en www.autobild.es facebook.com twitter.com Visita nuestro canal: www.youtube.com Suscríbete: www.youtube.com Test Euro NCAP...
Por los resultados del test Euro NCAP 2012, el Jeep Compass no se muestra como un fuerte competidor en materia de seguridad al compararse con otros rivales en la misma categoría.Sus resultados muestran Jeep Compass Euro...
El Jeep Compass ha obtenido una puntuación en materia de seguridad de sólo dos estrellas Euro NCAP frente a las cinco posibles, con lo que se convierte en el modelo menos seguro de su segmento. Euro NCAP Jeep...
COMMENTS Adult occupant The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Structures in the dashboard presented a risk of injury to the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies and the car was penalised. The Compass was tested with an optional side thorax airbag. In the side pole impact, dummy readings of rib deflections indicated a high risk of serious chest injury, even with the airbag fitted, and the car scored no points in that test. In the side barrier test, the car scored maximum points. Euro NCAP has reviewed data supplied by Jeep and concludes that scoring in the side barrier test is not significantly affected by the airbag. The Compass is equipped with an active head restraint. This senses when the car has been struck and deploys the restraint to reduce the distance between the head and the restraint. However, Jeep did not provide evidence to demonstrate that the system operates robustly over a range of speeds and impact severities specified by Euro NCAP, so the system was tested 'passively', without deployment. Test results indicated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in a rear impact. Child occupant Forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive in the frontal impact. In the side impact, both the 3 year and the 18 month dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the risk of contact with parts of the car's interior <b>...</b> 2012 Jeep Compass...
www.automoto.it Jeep Compass 2012...
Jeep Compass 2012...
Más información ( tiempomotor.com ) EuroNcap Jeep...
Jeep Compass ESC...
Jeep Compass...
COMMENTS Adult occupant The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Structures in the dashboard presented a risk of injury to the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies and the car was penalised. The Compass was tested with an optional side thorax airbag. In the side pole impact, dummy readings of rib deflections indicated a high risk of serious chest injury, even with the airbag fitted, and the car scored no points in that test. In the side barrier test, the car scored maximum points. Euro NCAP has reviewed data supplied by Jeep and concludes that scoring in the side barrier test is not significantly affected by the airbag. The Compass is equipped with an active head restraint. This senses when the car has been struck and deploys the restraint to reduce the distance between the head and the restraint. However, Jeep did not provide evidence to demonstrate that the system operates robustly over a range of speeds and impact severities specified by Euro NCAP, so the system was tested 'passively', without deployment. Test results indicated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in a rear impact. Child occupant Forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive in the frontal impact. In the side impact, both the 3 year and the 18 month dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the risk of contact with parts of the car's interior <b>...</b> 2012 Jeep Compass...
New Honda Civic 5 door receives 5-star Euro NCAP Overall Safety Rating and Advanced NCAP Award for Safety Innovation The new Honda Civic 5 door has been rated one of Europe's safest cars, according to new independent crash testing results from Euro NCAP. In addtion, Euro NCAP have announced that they are extending Honda's Advanced NCAP reward for its Collision Mitigation Braking System (CMBS) technology to include the new Civic. The new Honda Civic has been awarded Euro NCAP's maximum 5-star rating. The rating scheme focuses on the vehicle's overall safety performance which gives consumers an easy to understand single score. The system considers occupant protection, child protection, pedestrian protection and the availability of driver aids. Since the introduction of Euro NCAP's new rating scheme (February 2009) all Honda models tested have achieved 5 stars. Michiel van Ratingen, Euro NCAP Secretary General, commented ..." onmouseout="mouseOutImage(this, '4', 'FFFFFF')" onmouseover="mousOverImage(this,'bgc-NIK-wIA',1, '4','FFCC00')" /> 2012 Honda Civic...
Jeep Compass 2012...
( www.TFLcar.com ) The newly redesigned 2011 Jeep Compass goes mud wrestling in Wyoming. We drive it off-road in the mud and snow. 2011 Jeep Compass...
COMMENTS The rating of the Subaru XV has been upgraded from 2011 to 2012. The car is unchanged and test results have been carried over from the previous year. The 2012 rating reflects the performance of the XV against Euro NCAP's latest requirements. Adult occupant In the frontal impact, the passenger compartment remained stable. However, there was rupture of several spot-welds in the driver's footwell and the car was penalised. Subaru have informed Euro NCAP that they have made improvements to the welding in this area. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. However, structures in the dashboard were thought to pose a risk to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, the XV scored maximum points with good protection of all body areas. However, in the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated weak chest protection. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. Child occupant Based on dummy readings in the dynamic crash tests, the XV scored maximum points for its protection of the 18 month infant. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by their restraints, minimising the possibility of dangerous head contacts. The front passenger airbag <b>...</b> 2012 Subaru XV...

Page: 1 of 2

Siguiente